Use Case — Regulatory Knowledge Base with Chat
Scenario
A compliance team answers daily questions about an extensive regulatory body (laws, normative instructions, decisions). The answers must cite the exact source — LLM "guesswork" is not acceptable.
Flow on the platform
- Ingest the regulatory body. Regulations published on the web come in by URL with automatic article structuring — see Legislation Ingestion by URL. Internal documents (opinions, circulars in PDF/DOCX) come in through Upload.
- Curate the knowledge. The curation screen shows what was extracted (entities, relations, chunks) and allows correcting and enriching before releasing it for consumption — see Knowledge Curation.
- Monitor sources that change. Official sources are monitored and new versions trigger controlled re-ingestion — see Monitored Sources. The version history preserves "what was in force on each date".
- Ask in natural language. In the chat, the team asks as they would talk to a colleague — see Search. Hybrid retrieval (semantic + lexical) returns the relevant excerpts from the active context and the LLM answers citing the sources. Recurring prompts become shortcuts — see User Prompts.
- Go deeper in a notebook. Analyses that require cross-referencing (e.g. all regulations that cite a specific provision) run in the notebook with copilot
Outcome
- Answers with a source: every statement points to the provision and the source document, auditable at any time.
- The knowledge keeps up with the regulation: new versions ingested automatically, history preserved.
- Onboarding of new analysts drops from months to weeks — the knowledge base answers the repetitive questions.